I learnt a new terminology, called 'Von Restorff Effect'. It is a psychological term, means the people's memory does last long for something which stands out. I think this what as designer always mentions about 'uniqueness'. This is a very suitable term for describing 'No Pain, No Gain' working philosophy of some advertising agencies, isn't it?
Chucky Movie
Japan Autoway Tire (Caution: This is extremely scary, I strongly advice to mute the voice if you really scare of it)
Frankly, 'shock' and 'awe' pop out from my mind toward these three advertisements. I think the ultimate goal of them is gaining buzz-worthy attention, whether it is positive or negative. Recently, there are a lot of big companies utilize this method to advertise their brand or service, it could be both reward and risk, but I can make sure that the result in the end must be memorable to people. However, this approach might not be workable for SMEs in initial stage because people have no recognition about them before, once they use this method to 'torture' the people they are pranking, people would be hating these small businesses in rest of live.
Concerning about this EX approach (EX as in extreme), I am wondering what is the 'gain' of the advertisers look for. Professor of Marketing Michael Solomon said about this genre, "The dark side of the constant drumbeat to enhance consumer engagement." All the scenarios of fear and danger are testing the limits of personal privacy and social acceptability, it makes people's adrenaline increased instantly.
Scary advertising (idea) > Outdoor event/TVC (media) > Unsuspecting participants/Viewers (target group) > Terrified (public response) > Laugh at it/Scold abusively (public response) > Advertisers gets good reputation from it/ gets law letter from public (public action)
The last of the chain is showing the positive and negative cases, especially in sue-happy nations. This is the liability which advertisers need to concern about. To sum up this post, what I have found out in this stage is advertisers intend to make people talking, and thus become "memorable" in their mind. I would not say it is a very clever method, but it is a very impactful and quick way to get people response toward it. I believe that there are some hidden social issues behind this methodology.
To Be Continued...
Gianatasio, D. (2013) Prankvertising: Are Outrageous Marketing Stunts Worth the Risks? [Online] Available at: http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/prankvertising-are-outrageous-marketing-stunts-worth-risks-148238 [Accessed: 24th Dec, 2013].
Lidwell, W., Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2011) Universal Principles of Design: Revised and Updated Edition. Taiwan: Uni-Books. pp. 228-229, 254-255.












